Post by account_disabled on Feb 28, 2024 4:35:56 GMT
The available data belonging to natural persons running a business . Not all of them were informed about this fact - if they did not have the e-mail address of the company being processed, they did not decide to send a traditional letter, considering it to be a disproportionately large effort as indicated in the GDPR. The office decided that she should have done so and imposed a fine of almost one million zlotys. That is, a million for the fact that the Office assesses incommensurability differently . READ ALSO Contract with a photographer – what should you remember? Tomasz Palak It is a pity that the Office initially punished the company that had taken any steps to adapt to the new regulations.
The offices issued helpful interpretations of the regulations GDPR and monitoring, GDPR in schools, etc. and it could be expected that inspections would be carried out in these areas first and possibly penalties imposed. Moreover, there have been a number Chinese Europe Phone Number List of large data leaks recently Apricot and such companies were generally believed to be the first "in line". Yet the focus was not on technical aspects of security, but on a different interpretation of the word "disproportionate" by the punished person and the office.
The company appealed against this decision, arguing about processing via traditional mail would involve huge costs. Therefore, for now we do not treat it as final and I believe that the situation may change later in the decision. It is a pity that the Office wasted, in a sense, the opportunity to publicize the first penalty for something that may turn out to be ambiguous. What could you be punished for in other countries. Storing phone numbers for too long In Denmark, the Office imposed a fine on a taxi company in the amount of , , kroner for , , records in the database. Data breaches in banks This was.
The offices issued helpful interpretations of the regulations GDPR and monitoring, GDPR in schools, etc. and it could be expected that inspections would be carried out in these areas first and possibly penalties imposed. Moreover, there have been a number Chinese Europe Phone Number List of large data leaks recently Apricot and such companies were generally believed to be the first "in line". Yet the focus was not on technical aspects of security, but on a different interpretation of the word "disproportionate" by the punished person and the office.
The company appealed against this decision, arguing about processing via traditional mail would involve huge costs. Therefore, for now we do not treat it as final and I believe that the situation may change later in the decision. It is a pity that the Office wasted, in a sense, the opportunity to publicize the first penalty for something that may turn out to be ambiguous. What could you be punished for in other countries. Storing phone numbers for too long In Denmark, the Office imposed a fine on a taxi company in the amount of , , kroner for , , records in the database. Data breaches in banks This was.